by Alduous Huxley
A vision of our future world from Huxley’s view in the 1930′s when the helicopter was a striking new invention and Ford was changing the world with his mass production lines. After a big disaster the world has been condensed and formed into nine World States, each with a supreme leader. People are no longer born but are grown in conveyor-belt style, and specially engineered to fill their regimented social roles.
The reader follows some characters on the top of the scale, the Alphas, Bernard and Hutch. One struggles to fit into his social role and the other fits easily but longs for forbidden poetry. They both push the limits of their society and get entangled with a savage from one of the wild tribes left in southwestern America. Their struggles carry them to the top of society and end in disappointing, exhilarating, and utterly devastating ways.
Good book to read, just to be aware of it, and for it’s good points about society and good descriptive scenes. Some things are ludicrous, like the fact that this world structure would work, and the parts where John the Savage can argue eloquently and fully understand the depths of Shakespeare from seeing the book some while he was a child.
This book was among the ranks of Wuthering Heights, Frankenstein, Hamlet, Macbeth, and Gulliver’s Travels that we covered in AP English my senior year. Personally, I wanted to cover more books. What about Slaughterhouse Five? Middlemarch? In Cold Blood? Grapes of Wrath? Invisible Man? Catch-22? The Things They Carried? Of Mice and Men? Heart of Darkness? David Copperfield? Come on, let’s read people!
I did enjoy Wuthering Heights and Hamlet, but I think Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland would be a better substitute for Gulliver’s Travels. I’ve heard Brave New World and 1984 compared a lot, as Orual said in a conversation about AP books on College Confidential: “I recommend Brave New World over 1984, but it depends on whether you’d prefer to read about how things we like destroy us or about how things we hate destroy us.”





This is Shakespeare’s shortest play, written for the attention span of King James. It is loosely based on historical events.





Fahrenheit 451
This book is ripe for discussion. So many intricate ideas bursting from the pages. The image of the mechanical Hound was quite frightening to me and well-played by the author. The aspects of the story that suggest a nihilistic existence, such as nothing to do but watch TV, Montag wandering around with a group of bums, etc., gave me a depressed feeling similar to the futility in other dystopian future books (1984, Brave New World).
I liked this book more after I had read the author’s note. Ray Bradbury sounds so interesting on a personal level! Did you know he wrote this story intending to show his great love for books and libraries? As I read these 50′s and other early books I sometimes struggle to get into the story, they seem fundamentally different somehow.
An interesting historical note from GradeSaver.com:
“Developed in the years following World War II, Fahrenheit 451condemns not only the anti-intellectualism of the defeated Nazi party in Germany, but more immediately the intellectually oppressive political climate of the early 1950′s – the heyday of McCarthyism. That such influential fictional social criticisms such as Orwell’s Animal Farm 1984 and Skinner’s Walden Two were published just a few short years prior to Fahrenheit 451 is not coincidental. These works reveal a very real apprehension of the danger of the US evolving into an oppressive, authoritarian society in the post-WWII period.“
Stemming from a similar basis of a future literature-less society, The Last Book in the Universe, YA and written in 2000, is another good book to read.
→ 2 Comments
Posted in B+, English Lit class, Science Fiction, The Classics
Tagged Captain Beatty, Clarisse McClellan, dystopia, Fahrenheit 451, Granger, Guy Montag, mechanical hound, nuclear, Professor Faber, Ray Bradbury, social commentary, vagrants