(This is a retelling of Beauty and the Beast.) Kind of nice. This book reminded me a lot of Spindle’s End. Please pardon me, but for whatever reason, some of McKinley’s books do not agree with me. Mainly I feel that the core story of Beauty and the Beast was neglected and most of the emphasis is on the back story, which I suppose is understandable and likely what she was going for. But personally I get more enjoyment out of my shady perception of the tale and the Disney depiction.
First off there was a severe separation between the life with the sisters at home and the (short) life with the Beast in the castle. The transition’s drama and emotional upheavals didn’t seem real. The magic, integral to the story, was left murky where it could’ve been explained, and there were weird bits like one finds at the end of Spindle’s End. Because after all magic has to make sense a little bit.
Secondly, none of the details of the fantasy world really struck me. I felt like McKinley much more focused on the blacksmith shop and the garden by the little country house than the lawns and gardens of the castle. But that’s not altogether true; Beauty’s room was a nice enough place that saw some setting development. Importantly, though, I was severely unaware of what the Beast was supposed to look like and struggled to visualize him the whole time, even after he transformed. His past self, the character in the painting, was well-played though. And I think the character with the best development is the horse.
Overall, there are points where this book shines and others where I was left grasping. But in the end it did not leave me with a strikingly different interpretation or probing look at the tale that I always knew. So, sorry Ms. McKinley, but I’d say stick with the real greats, The Blue Sword and The Hero and the Crown.